Across a turbulent decade for global aviation, Australia and New Zealand’s carriers have quietly cemented a reputation as the industry’s safety pacemakers. From Qantas and Virgin Australia to Air New Zealand and Jetstar, airlines from these two countries are consistently clustered at the very top of annual global safety rankings, while regulators in Canberra and Wellington are increasingly treated as reference points by their counterparts abroad. Together, they are shaping how the next era of safer, more resilient air travel will look.

More News

Top of the Global Safety Tables Year After Year

Independent safety rankings over the past three years show a recurring pattern: airlines based in Australia and New Zealand dominate the very top of the lists. For 2024, AirlineRatings.com named Air New Zealand the world’s safest airline, with Qantas in second place and Virgin Australia in third. Jetstar, the Qantas Group’s low cost brand, was ranked the safest low cost carrier, putting one company from the region at the pinnacle of both full service and budget categories.

The momentum has continued. For 2025, AirlineRatings.com and other travel outlets again placed Air New Zealand first among full service airlines, edging out Qantas largely on the strength of its younger fleet and strong incident-management record. Qantas retained its position in the top tier, while Virgin Australia and Jetstar Group also remained inside the global top 10 for safety, further cementing the region’s influence on the standards by which airlines are judged.

These rankings are based on more than headline accidents. Methodologies typically assess serious incident histories, compliance with International Civil Aviation Organization audits, fleet age and maintenance records, pilot training programs, transparency in reporting and financial strength. On almost every measure, the large carriers of Australia and New Zealand have scored consistently high, turning safety culture into a core part of their global branding.

Engine Monitoring, Data Sharing and a Proactive Safety Culture

One reason regional airlines continue to set the pace is their willingness to invest early in technologies that allow hazards to be identified before passengers notice a problem. Qantas, for example, was among the first major carriers to roll out real time engine monitoring across its fleet using satellite communications. That capability allows engineers to detect anomalies and schedule preventive maintenance before minor issues evolve into operational disruptions or safety concerns.

Australian and New Zealand carriers have also leaned heavily into data sharing and safety reporting. Under so called just culture policies, crew members are encouraged to report mistakes, procedural gaps or near misses without fear of automatic punishment, provided there is no willful negligence. This has led to richer internal databases on operational risk and more open collaboration with regulators, aircraft manufacturers and airport authorities.

On the flight deck, airlines in both countries are viewed as early adopters of enhanced training in areas such as upset recovery, fatigue management and automation reliance. Many of these programs go beyond mandated standards, incorporating scenario based simulators that replay real world incidents. The result is a feedback loop in which training is continually updated as new risks emerge, from wake turbulence patterns on heavily trafficked routes to changes in polar weather systems.

Regulators That Inspect, Audit and Influence the World

Behind the high profile carriers sits an architecture of regulators that are unusually assertive by global standards. Australia’s Civil Aviation Safety Authority and New Zealand’s Civil Aviation Authority are widely cited in industry circles for rigorous oversight regimes that combine frequent audits with clear, enforceable rules. Both agencies routinely implement or adapt global safety recommendations early, rather than waiting for consensus among larger blocs.

These regulators operate under the umbrella of the International Civil Aviation Organization but often go further than the minimum baseline. Their inspectors scrutinize operator maintenance systems, safety management frameworks and pilot training curricula, not just paperwork. Airlines that fall short face binding directions, operational restrictions or, in the most serious cases, loss of certification. For the major carriers, that pressure has reinforced a culture where compliance is treated as the starting point, not the finish line.

Because Australia and New Zealand oversee carriers that fly long haul into North America, Europe and Asia, their regulatory choices can have outsized influence. When these authorities tighten requirements on, for instance, runway overrun protection or turbulence risk management, they indirectly raise expectations for partner airlines and airports across multiple continents. The region’s regulators have become quiet norm setters, exporting their safety philosophy via bilateral agreements and alliance partnerships.

Long Haul Specialists Turning Ultra Long Flights into Safety Testbeds

Geography has forced airlines in Australia and New Zealand to become specialists in long haul and ultra long haul operations, where safety margins must remain robust over many hours and across diverse weather systems. Air New Zealand’s flagship routes between Auckland and North America, including ultra long segments such as New York to Auckland, and Qantas’s long transpacific and so called “Kangaroo Route” flights to Europe, demand strict fatigue management, meticulous fuel and diversion planning, and highly reliable aircraft.

These airlines have leveraged those challenges to refine practices that other carriers increasingly emulate. Crew duty time limitations, in flight rest facilities, augmented cockpit crews and sophisticated rostering tools are all used to minimize fatigue risks on overnight and multi sector journeys. Airlines in the region were also early adopters of onboard and ground based turbulence tracking programs, helping crews anticipate and avoid rough air that has generated higher concern worldwide as climate patterns shift.

Fleet renewal strategies are another part of this long haul safety equation. Qantas and Air New Zealand have ordered successive generations of fuel efficient widebodies with advanced safety and monitoring systems, including Airbus A350 variants and Boeing 787 Dreamliners. Newer airframes generally offer better redundancy, improved avionics and more resilient materials. While no fleet can be entirely incident free, operating younger aircraft at the core of long haul networks reduces the probability of age related technical faults.

Low Cost, High Standards: Jetstar and the New Safety Benchmark

One of the most notable developments in recent years is how low cost carriers from the region have matched or exceeded the safety performance of many full service airlines. Jetstar, based in Australia and operating across the Asia Pacific, has repeatedly been named the safest low cost airline in the world. In more recent assessments, the broader Jetstar Group placed near the top of expanded rankings that now include dozens of budget carriers globally.

This success is not accidental. Jetstar is embedded within the Qantas Group, giving it access to the parent company’s maintenance expertise, training infrastructure and safety management systems. Aircraft are maintained to the same high standards, and pilots often move between group airlines over the course of their careers. The result is a low cost business model that strips out extras on the passenger side without cutting corners on engineering, crew training or oversight.

Virgin Australia, which operates as a hybrid between full service and low cost models on some routes, has similarly distinguished itself. Its climb into the very top tier of global safety rankings in 2024 highlighted how carriers focused on cost-conscious travelers can still pursue best in class safety cultures. For regulators and industry analysts, these examples challenge lingering perceptions that budget pricing equates to lower safety standards.

Rebuilding Trust After Turbulent Years

The region’s safety leadership is all the more striking given the reputational turbulence some carriers have faced. Qantas, in particular, weathered a storm of criticism over flight disruptions, customer service problems and legal disputes over labor decisions during and after the pandemic. Domestic surveys revealed a sharp drop in public trust, and the airline’s consumer rankings fell, even as its safety record remained strong.

In response, Qantas has embarked on an extensive renewal program reported to be worth close to a billion dollars. Investments have focused on upgrading cabins, modernizing lounges, improving digital systems to reduce delays and overhauling operational processes that contributed to the earlier period of disruption. While much of that effort is aimed at the customer experience, the airline has repeatedly emphasized that safety remains the central, non-negotiable priority that underpins every other reform.

Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand have faced their own pandemic era pressures, from border closures to surging travel demand once restrictions lifted. In each case, airlines had to rapidly scale operations back up while managing staff shortages, supply chain constraints and evolving health protocols. Their ability to navigate these stresses without significant safety incidents has been cited by aviation analysts as evidence of resilient underlying systems and training.

From Cabin Videos to Crisis Drills: Human Factors in Focus

Technology and regulation alone do not create safer skies. Australian and New Zealand airlines have become known for investing heavily in the human factors that determine how well safety procedures work day to day. Cabin crew are trained not only in standard emergency responses but in advanced customer communication, conflict de-escalation and mental health awareness, reflecting the broader range of situations they now face on board.

Air New Zealand’s high profile safety videos, while often discussed for their creativity and tourism tie ins, are underpinned by serious intent. By making mandatory briefings more engaging, the airline seeks to increase passenger attention to life jacket locations, exit rows and brace positions. Other carriers in the region have experimented with different formats, but all share the goal of turning an easily ignored routine into information that travelers are more likely to retain in an emergency.

Behind the scenes, airlines regularly stage emergency response drills that simulate everything from runway overruns and onboard medical crises to security incidents at remote airports. These exercises often involve coordination with national emergency services, airport operators and international partners, ensuring that communication lines and decision making protocols are tested before they are needed in real life. Such drills are resource intensive, but senior executives have increasingly framed them as non-negotiable insurance against worst case scenarios.

Shaping the Next Phase of Global Aviation Safety

As aviation grapples with new challenges from climate related turbulence to the integration of artificial intelligence in flight operations and air traffic management, Australian and New Zealand airlines are positioning themselves as proving grounds for emerging safety concepts. Trials of more precise turbulence prediction tools, for example, are being pioneered on some of the region’s longest routes, where even small reductions in unexpected rough air can significantly cut injuries and structural stress over time.

Both countries are also part of international conversations about how to regulate increasingly automated cockpit systems while preserving pilot authority and situational awareness. Their major airlines operate many of the latest generation jets and have been early adopters of new avionics suites, giving regulators real world data on how crews interact with more capable automation. That experience is feeding back into discussions about future certification standards and training requirements.

Looking ahead, the combination of demanding long haul operations, robust regulatory oversight and a track record of willingly opening their books to outside auditors places Australia and New Zealand at the center of debates about what modern aviation safety should look like. For travelers, the practical outcome is clear. On many of the world’s most remote and challenging routes, the airlines carrying the flags of these two countries are increasingly viewed as setting the standard by which others are measured, quietly redefining what safe global travel means in the 2020s and beyond.