Iran’s fragile tourism rebound is facing a sharp reversal as a wave of new travel warnings, the withdrawal of international insurance coverage and the country’s most sweeping internet shutdowns to date unsettle foreign visitors and tour operators.

After two years of steady growth in arrivals, the early weeks of 2026 have brought a convergence of political risk and digital isolation that industry insiders say is freezing bookings and threatening thousands of tourism-related jobs.

More News

A Recovery Years in the Making Suddenly Stalls

Before the latest unrest and internet blackout, Iran’s tourism industry had been cautiously celebrating a return to growth after the pandemic and the 2019–2022 protest cycles. The UN World Tourism Organization reported that Iran welcomed about 5.9 million foreign tourists in 2023, a 43 percent increase on 2022, reflecting strong pent-up demand for the country’s ancient heritage sites and diverse landscapes. Iranian officials later said total foreign arrivals in the Persian year ending March 2024 topped 6.3 million, and 2024 data pointed to further gains.

By mid-2024, UN Tourism figures showed some 3.1 million international visitors in just the first half of the year, leaving arrivals still around one-third below 2019 but clearly trending upward. Domestic authorities claimed that 7.3 million foreign visitors were recorded in the Persian year ending March 20, 2025, confirming that the sector had become one of the few growth engines in an economy otherwise squeezed by sanctions and inflation.

Tourism officials in Tehran framed these numbers as proof that Iran could compete again with regional destinations, especially for cultural and religious travel from neighboring countries. Investment plans centered on expanding hotel capacity, improving transport links and easing visa rules for dozens of nationalities. For a brief window, industry forecasts spoke optimistically of reaching or even surpassing the pre-pandemic peak of roughly 8.8 million visitors within a few years.

The events of late 2025 and January 2026 have upended those projections. Instead of building on a slow but real recovery, the sector is now confronting a deep crisis shaped not by global health restrictions but by domestic political turmoil, digital isolation and a hardening of foreign governments’ risk assessments.

“Do Not Travel”: Western Advisories Turn Red

Western governments had long urged caution for travel to Iran, but recent months have seen a clear hardening of official guidance. The United States continues to classify Iran as a destination where citizens should not travel at all, warning of arbitrary detention, the risk of hostage-taking and the absence of consular support. European capitals including London, Berlin and Paris already advised against non-essential travel in much of the country and have strengthened those notices in response to the latest protests and security clampdowns.

Canada and Australia similarly maintain strict advisories, cautioning against travel to Iran because of the risk of arbitrary arrest, restrictions on dual nationals and the potential for sudden border closures or flight disruptions. While such warnings do not ban travel outright, they act as a powerful deterrent for mainstream tourists, many of whom rely on their governments’ assessments when choosing long-haul destinations.

For organized tour operators, the color of the map on official advisory pages is more than symbolic. Package providers that cater to North American, European and Australian markets often cannot operate in countries under the highest-tier warnings without violating insurance rules or corporate risk policies. Even when departures remain technically possible, operators report that customers are increasingly unwilling to commit deposits for a destination where the political and security outlook can change overnight.

Iranian tourism businesses argue that many of these warnings present a blanket picture that does not match conditions in much of the country, particularly at major cultural sites like Isfahan, Shiraz and Yazd. Yet they also acknowledge that sporadic unrest, heavy-handed policing and high-profile arrests of foreigners have created an atmosphere in which reassurance is difficult. The latest advisories, they say, risk undoing years of work to convince hesitant travelers that Iran can be both safe and welcoming.

Insurance Withdrawals Shrink the Viable Market

If government travel warnings shape perceptions, the decisions of global insurance underwriters quietly determine what is practically possible for many visitors. Over the past year, several international insurers and assistance providers have scaled back or ceased coverage for trips to Iran, classifying the destination as high risk or excluding it under general “sanctions and conflict” clauses. Industry sources say that the January 2026 crackdown and extended internet shutdown have accelerated internal reviews at large firms that provide travel medical and evacuation coverage.

For independent travelers, reduced insurance options translate into higher premiums, limited benefits or outright refusals to issue policies that include Iran. For group tours, the problem is more acute. Many operators are contractually bound to provide comprehensive coverage, including emergency evacuation and political risk support. Without an insurer willing to underwrite those risks, departures must be cancelled or redesigned to exclude Iranian segments, regardless of demand.

The retreat of insurers also affects aviation and cruise operators. Airlines that had slowly rebuilt their schedules to Iranian cities after the pandemic face rising war-risk and liability premiums. Some regional carriers have trimmed frequencies or shifted capacity to other Middle Eastern hubs seen as more stable. Niche cruise and overland adventure companies that once featured calls at Iranian ports or crossings through its territory have quietly removed those options from upcoming seasons.

Local Iranian insurers exist and continue to offer coverage, often at competitive prices. But foreign travelers and companies frequently insist on contracts governed by jurisdictions they know and trust, with claims payable outside Iran’s financial system. The widening gap between international risk models and Tehran’s insistence that the country remains safe for tourists is making it harder to bridge that trust deficit.

Internet Blackouts Hit a Digitally Dependent Industry

What differentiates the current crisis from earlier episodes of unrest is the extent and duration of the internet shutdown imposed in January 2026. Following a new wave of anti-government protests over economic grievances and the devaluation of the rial, authorities sharply curbed access to the global internet on January 8. Connectivity has since partially recovered but remains patchy, heavily filtered and subject to sudden localized outages, according to digital rights monitors.

Reports from Tehran and major provincial cities describe a system in which many global platforms remain blocked and businesses are granted only short, surveilled windows of higher-speed access. The government’s long-running project to develop a domestic “national internet” has kept certain local services functioning, but for foreign visitors and international companies, the partial decoupling from the global web has severe implications.

Tourism is now deeply digital. Visitors rely on messaging apps to coordinate with guides, ride-hailing services to navigate cities, online booking platforms to secure accommodation and mapping tools to move independently. When these services become unreliable or unavailable, the practical difficulties of travel multiply. Tour operators recount cases of clients unable to contact local representatives on arrival, card payment systems failing without warning, and even basic tasks like confirming a return flight becoming unexpectedly complex.

For Iranian tourism entrepreneurs, the blackout has been devastating. Many small guesthouses, restaurants and handicraft sellers built their businesses around Instagram, messaging channels and international booking engines that suddenly stopped working or became accessible only via risky, often paid VPN services. With visibility to foreign customers cut and online payments disrupted, revenues have collapsed at the very moment when inflation and currency weakness are driving up operating costs.

A Push Toward a “National Internet” Raises Long-Term Fears

Beyond the immediate disruption, activists and analysts warn that Iranian authorities appear to be using the present crisis to accelerate a long-planned restructuring of the country’s digital infrastructure. Over the past decade, officials have worked to develop a heavily controlled domestic network that can operate largely independently of the global internet, citing security, cultural and economic rationales. Recent reporting by international media and digital rights groups suggests a renewed push to make this national network the default environment for most users.

Under such a model, only government-approved entities and individuals would enjoy tightly filtered access to the wider web, while ordinary citizens and visitors would be channeled through domestic platforms subject to extensive surveillance and censorship. For travelers, this would mean that many of the apps and websites they rely on abroad could be permanently unreachable or function only in limited, monitored ways. Even if technical workarounds like satellite links or advanced VPNs become more available to affluent locals, mass tourism depends on predictable, legally sanctioned connectivity that most visitors can use without special knowledge.

Tourism stakeholders fear that a de facto break with the global internet would deepen Iran’s isolation and deter the mainstream visitors needed to sustain airlines, large hotels and heritage conservation projects. While a small segment of adventure travelers may still be drawn by the very difficulty of access, the broader market of culture-focused, higher-spending tourists typically demands at least a baseline of digital comfort. Without the ability to post, communicate and transact freely, Iran risks becoming a niche destination primarily for the most determined or regionally based travelers.

Economists have already linked partial shutdowns and filtering to substantial daily losses across the wider economy. For tourism, where online discovery, instant reviews and digital storytelling play a critical role in destination marketing, the long-term cost of severed connectivity could be even higher. A country that many visitors describe as remarkably hospitable in person may struggle to project that image to the world if its digital windows remain shuttered.

From Growth Engine to Vulnerable Lifeline

In a sanctions-hit economy, tourism occupies an unusual position. It brings in hard currency while requiring comparatively modest imports, spreads income beyond the capital and major industrial centers, and showcases a softer image of the country abroad. Iranian officials have repeatedly highlighted tourism as a strategic sector capable of creating large numbers of jobs, especially for women and young people in provincial cities.

Prior to the current downturn, estimates suggested that tourism and related services accounted for roughly 4 to 5 percent of Iran’s gross domestic product, with scope for significantly more if arrivals approached the ambitious targets set by policymakers. Investments in hotels, ecolodges and cultural infrastructure have created new livelihoods in regions that host UNESCO-listed sites, from the ruins of Persepolis to the bazaars of Tabriz and the gardens of Kashan.

The present crisis exposes how vulnerable that lifeline is to domestic political decisions and international perceptions. When security forces respond to protests with force, when courts hand down long sentences to dual nationals on security charges, or when authorities pull the plug on the internet, the reputational damage to Iran as a destination is swift and global. Travel advisories, insurance risk models and social media narratives amplify that damage in ways that can take years to reverse.

Local operators warn that if current conditions persist into the peak spring season around Nowruz, cancellations could cascade through the rest of the year. Many small businesses operate on thin margins and have limited reserves after years of instability and pandemic closures. A sudden drop in foreign bookings this spring may push some to shutter permanently or pivot entirely to domestic clientele, reducing the diversity and capacity of services available to future international visitors.

What Travelers and the Industry Are Doing Now

In the face of mounting uncertainty, travelers and industry players are recalibrating their relationship with Iran. Some large international tour operators have suspended departures indefinitely, offering clients rebooking options to other Middle Eastern destinations with more stable risk profiles. Others are keeping a handful of late-2026 dates on the calendar but warning that they may be cancelled at short notice depending on the security and connectivity situation.

Individual travelers who still wish to visit are increasingly relying on specialist agencies with deep local networks and experience navigating shifting regulations. These agents emphasize the need for flexible itineraries, backup communication plans and a clear understanding of the risks involved, particularly for dual nationals and those working in sensitive professions such as journalism or activism.

Within Iran, tourism businesses are lobbying for more predictable policies. Hoteliers and guides point out that every day of blackout or heightened tension not only erodes current revenue but also undermines the long-term narrative that the country is open for visitors. Some argue that a more targeted approach to security, clearer legal protections for tourists and a commitment to restoring stable international connectivity would do more to support national interests than sweeping restrictions that scare off even sympathetic guests.

For now, however, the gap between official rhetoric listing tourism as a priority and the lived reality of operators trying to host foreigners in the midst of blackouts and protests remains wide. Until that gap narrows, Iran’s tourism economy is likely to remain in a state of suspended animation, poised between the possibilities of its rich cultural offerings and the constraints of its political environment.

FAQ

Q1. Is it currently safe for foreign tourists to travel to Iran?
Safety assessments vary by government, but several Western countries classify Iran as a high-risk or “do not travel” destination due to concerns about arbitrary detention, political unrest and limited consular support. Many travelers who do visit report hospitable experiences, yet the combination of security crackdowns and internet restrictions means risks are higher and conditions can change quickly.

Q2. How have internet shutdowns affected tourists on the ground?
The January 2026 shutdown and ongoing filtering have disrupted messaging apps, navigation tools, online bookings and digital payments. Tourists may find it difficult to contact guides, confirm transport, access maps or share travel documents, and often need workarounds such as local SIM cards, offline maps or VPNs, which are not always reliable or legal.

Q3. Can I still get travel insurance that covers a trip to Iran?
Options are increasingly limited. Some international insurers have excluded Iran from standard policies or classify it as a high-risk destination requiring special underwriting, often at higher cost and with more exclusions. Travelers should check carefully whether medical, evacuation and political risk coverage explicitly applies to Iran before booking.

Q4. Are international flights to Iran still operating?
Yes, several regional and a few international airlines continue to serve major Iranian airports, although schedules may change with demand and risk assessments. Political tensions or new sanctions can lead to sudden adjustments, so passengers are advised to monitor their airline communications closely and allow for contingency plans.

Q5. How important is tourism to Iran’s economy?
Tourism and related services contribute a modest but significant share of Iran’s economy and are seen by officials as a growth sector capable of generating foreign currency and jobs. After pandemic lows, the rebound in visitor numbers during 2023 and 2024 offered rare good news, which is why the current downturn is causing deep concern among business owners and policymakers.

Q6. What kinds of tourists typically visit Iran?
Iran attracts a mix of religious pilgrims from neighboring countries, cultural and historical travelers interested in its ancient sites, diaspora visitors returning to see family, and a smaller cohort of adventure tourists. Western leisure travelers remain a minority but are valued for their higher average spending and longer stays.

Q7. Are there legal risks for dual nationals visiting Iran?
Yes, multiple Western governments specifically warn dual nationals of heightened risk, noting past cases where individuals holding Iranian and foreign citizenship have been detained on security-related charges. Dual nationals considering travel are strongly advised to review their government’s latest guidance and weigh the potential legal and consular complications.

Q8. How do travel warnings affect organized tours?
High-level government advisories often trigger contractual and insurance limitations for tour operators. When a destination is rated “do not travel” or equivalent, many companies must cancel or suspend trips because their liability coverage and risk policies no longer permit operations there, even if local partners are still willing to host visitors.

Q9. Could Iran’s move toward a national internet be permanent?
Digital rights experts say authorities have spent years building the infrastructure for a more isolated, state-controlled network and are now testing how far they can go. While economic costs and public dissatisfaction may push for some easing, there is a real possibility that tighter structural controls on connectivity will remain, with lasting implications for tourism.

Q10. What should prospective visitors watch for in the coming months?
Key indicators include changes in foreign travel advisories, the status of the internet shutdown and filtering, reports of unrest in major cities, airline schedule adjustments and any announcements from insurers about coverage for Iran. Together, these factors will shape whether the country becomes easier or harder to access for international tourists in the near term.