More news on this day
Rising oil and jet fuel prices are reshaping the economics of U.S. air travel, and a widening divide is emerging between carriers that have invested in strategic defenses against fuel volatility and those now battling heavy losses, restructurings and mounting financial risk.
Get the latest news straight to your inbox!

Fuel Costs Climb Even as Consumption Slows
Industry data indicate that U.S. airlines are paying more for each gallon of jet fuel even as they work to burn less of it. Figures from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics for late 2025 show that scheduled carriers cut fuel consumption by nearly 8 percent between October and November, yet the average price per gallon rose more than 3 percent in the same period, underscoring how sensitive operating costs remain to commodity markets and refining margins.
Fuel typically ranks as the second-largest expense for most airlines after labor, and recent volatility has reinforced that exposure. Consulting analyses published in early 2026 describe how U.S. carriers have largely stepped away from the complex financial hedging contracts that once buffered them from rapid price swings, leaving most operators more directly exposed to spot and short-term market prices.
This environment has magnified the importance of structural strategies such as fleet renewal, refinery ownership and sustainable aviation fuel procurement, which aim to reduce overall fuel burn or secure more predictable supply. It has also intensified pressure on airlines with older fleets, limited financial flexibility or challenged route networks, many of which now confront difficult restructuring decisions.
Southwest Reworks Its Fuel Strategy and Cost Base
Southwest Airlines, long regarded as a pioneer in fuel hedging, is now relying more on operational discipline and network changes to contain energy costs. Recent financial disclosures for 2025 show that fuel and oil remained a significant share of the carrier’s expenses, but that management has been reshaping its approach after gradually unwinding many of its remaining hedge positions and updating its accounting treatment of derivatives.
Company filings and investor updates indicate that Southwest has been targeting unit cost control excluding fuel, while also planning for fuel prices in the low-to-mid two dollar range per gallon for late 2025. Analysts note that the airline’s historic hedging program delivered large gains in past oil spikes but became a drag when energy prices fell, prompting a pivot toward more direct exposure combined with efficiency measures.
Southwest has also moved to cut fuel use at the margin through fleet and operational initiatives. Publicly available information shows that the carrier has continued to take delivery of more efficient Boeing 737 MAX aircraft and has started using sustainable jet fuel at Chicago Midway, steps that modestly lower its long-term fuel intensity even as sustainable aviation fuel itself currently carries a price premium.
United and Delta Lean on Fleet, Refinery and Sustainable Fuel
United Airlines and Delta Air Lines have each developed distinct strategies to tackle the same fuel challenge. United has focused on fleet renewal and sustainable aviation fuel partnerships, while Delta has leaned on its refinery ownership and a broad internal efficiency drive to manage costs.
United’s recent corporate reports and investor commentary highlight a rapid introduction of new, more fuel-efficient aircraft and the retirement of older jets. The airline has also expanded its use of sustainable aviation fuel at major hubs including Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, Newark and Washington-area airports, positioning these investments as both a decarbonization tool and a partial hedge against long-term fuel price volatility.
Delta, by contrast, continues to benefit from its Monroe Energy refinery near Philadelphia, which produces jet fuel and other refined products. Financial results for 2025 show that Delta’s adjusted fuel price fell around 10 percent year over year, with management attributing a several-cent-per-gallon benefit to the refinery. Delta has also reported meeting internal fuel savings milestones through a cross-company effort to optimize flight operations, aircraft weight and ground procedures, delivering measurable reductions in jet fuel consumption.
Both United and Delta frame these initiatives as central to broader strategies that combine cost control with emissions reduction goals. Their experiences suggest that while airlines may no longer rely heavily on financial hedging, structural investments in fuel supply, aircraft technology and operating practices can meaningfully influence the bottom line when oil prices rise.
Smaller and Low-Cost Carriers Confront Financial Strain
While the largest U.S. network carriers refine their strategies around fuel, some competitors are struggling to absorb higher operating costs. Ultra-low-cost carrier Spirit Airlines has become one of the most visible examples of this pressure, entering Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in late 2024, emerging in March 2025, and then filing again in August 2025 after continued losses and cash burn.
Court filings and restructuring updates describe how Spirit has been hit by a combination of elevated fuel prices, engine-related fleet disruptions, intense fare competition and a debt-heavy balance sheet. Rising fuel costs have been especially challenging for a business model built around very low base fares, limited ancillary pricing flexibility compared with larger rivals and little ability to absorb sudden cost shocks.
Spirit has since moved to shrink its network, ground or retire less efficient aircraft and renegotiate parts of its cost structure during the latest bankruptcy process. Company statements in early 2026 indicate an intention to emerge as a smaller, leaner airline with a somewhat more diversified product, but the episode illustrates the vulnerability of lower-margin carriers when fuel and other operating expenses climb simultaneously.
Other budget-focused and regional airlines have also reported margin compression and schedule adjustments as a result of higher fuel and maintenance costs, along with softer demand on some leisure and secondary routes. Analysts note that, unlike the largest hub carriers, these operators often lack the pricing power, premium cabins or loyalty ecosystems that can help offset rising unit costs.
New Challenges: Sustainable Fuel Premiums and Policy Shifts
As airlines adapt to elevated fuel costs, a new layer of complexity is emerging around the transition to cleaner aviation fuels. Sustainable aviation fuel is widely seen as a critical tool for limiting emissions growth, yet it remains significantly more expensive than conventional jet fuel and is available only in limited quantities, adding further cost pressure for early adopters.
Recent policy moves illustrate how governments are beginning to share those costs with travelers. Singapore, for example, has introduced a levy on tickets to fund sustainable aviation fuel purchases, while tax credits and incentives in the United States are designed to encourage both airlines and fuel producers to scale up production. Industry forecasts suggest that, even with support, the premium attached to sustainable aviation fuel will weigh on airline cost structures for years.
For carriers like United, Delta and Southwest, which have all announced sustainable fuel initiatives at specific airports, the challenge is to integrate these higher-cost supplies without undermining competitiveness. Larger airlines may be better placed to spread the impact across global networks and premium revenue streams, while smaller carriers could struggle to participate at scale in the early stages of the transition.
The interplay between volatile oil markets, the expense of sustainable aviation fuel and shifting regulatory expectations is likely to keep energy at the center of airline strategy. For now, airlines with diversified tools to manage fuel exposure appear to be pulling ahead, while others face a difficult climb to remain aloft in an era of structurally higher operating costs.