Google logo Follow us on Google

Women across the United Kingdom report feeling unsafe in and around train stations, according to a new investigation that highlights systemic weaknesses in staffing, lighting and basic security measures across the rail network.

Get the latest news straight to your inbox!

New survey exposes safety fears for women at UK train stations

Safety gaps revealed in nationwide station investigation

An investigation by Soroptimist International Great Britain and Ireland into safety standards at UK train stations has identified widespread gaps in measures designed to help passengers feel secure. The organisation’s Railway Station Safety Survey, published in 2026, examined a broad sample of stations and reported that more than half lacked visible security provision. Only a small minority were staffed at all times, leaving many passengers, particularly women, navigating largely empty concourses and platforms, especially after dark.

The survey found that around 55 percent of stations assessed did not have an obvious security presence, and nearly half had no uniformed staff visible to passengers. Many stations were also described as poorly lit, with almost half of car parks characterised as dim, isolated or lacking clearly marked safe areas. Researchers concluded that such physical conditions combine with social factors to create an environment where women, in particular, often feel exposed and vulnerable rather than reassured.

The report stressed that the issue is not confined to a few remote locations. Concerns were recorded at a mix of large urban hubs, commuter stops and rural stations, suggesting that discomfort and fear among women travellers are recurring themes across the network rather than isolated experiences.

Evidence of rising harassment and persistent fear

The sense of unease reported in stations sits against a broader backdrop of rising concern about harassment and violence on rail services. Recent analysis of rail safety coverage indicates that reports of sexual harassment on trains in the United Kingdom have increased significantly over the past decade. Media summaries of policing and court data describe a marked growth in recorded incidents, reinforcing what many passenger surveys have already suggested about daily experiences on the network.

Parallel research into public transport more generally has found that women are considerably more likely than men to feel unsafe while travelling. A government-backed study on perceptions of personal safety on public transport, published in 2024, reported that women, younger people and those with health conditions consistently rated their journeys as less safe than other groups. Concerns were especially acute for ethnic minority women and those from other marginalised communities, who were more likely to anticipate discrimination or abuse when using buses and trains.

For Muslim women, a large-scale national study conducted in 2025 by Muslim Census and Muslims in Rail highlighted an even more severe picture. The research reported that Muslim women were several times more likely than women in the wider UK population to feel unsafe on public transport and that a large majority had changed their travel behaviour because of fear. Many respondents said they avoided particular stations or times of day, or paid for more expensive alternatives such as taxis to minimise their exposure to hostility or harassment.

Design, lighting and staffing shape how safe stations feel

Investigations into women’s safety at train stations repeatedly identify the physical design of stations as a critical factor in how secure they feel. The Soroptimist survey described many sites with poorly lit entrances, underpasses and car parks, as well as narrow footpaths and secluded stairwells that are difficult to avoid when exiting a station. These features can magnify fears that harassment or assault might go unseen, particularly when there are few other passengers around.

Government research on travel attitudes has consistently shown that lighting is central to women’s sense of safety. Earlier waves of the National Travel Attitudes Study found that among women who had felt unsafe when walking to or waiting at a stop or station, a majority cited poor or absent lighting as a key factor. The latest perceptions-of-safety analysis published in 2024 reaffirmed that view, noting that women were significantly more likely than men to see dimly lit approaches, empty platforms and isolated waiting areas as potential risks rather than minor inconveniences.

Staffing levels are another point of tension. Trade union briefings and passenger advocacy campaigns argue that the removal of ticket office staff and reductions in on-platform personnel have eroded a vital layer of informal security. Research summarised by rail unions suggests that the visible presence of trained staff can deter some forms of aggression and gives many women confidence that someone can intervene or help if incidents occur. The Soroptimist investigation reported that at almost half of the stations surveyed there were no uniformed workers in sight, even during busier periods, leaving many travellers reliant solely on CCTV and remote help points.

Official reviews and policy responses

In recent years, the UK government and rail industry bodies have commissioned a series of studies to understand and respond to women’s safety concerns on public transport. In 2024 the Department for Transport published an interventions scan on transport safety for women and girls, mapping dozens of measures being trialled across the country. These included targeted policing patrols, bystander awareness campaigns, redesign of station layouts, better lighting and the creation of clearly signed safe waiting zones for onward travel such as taxis and buses.

The Soroptimist survey notes that some of these initiatives have started to appear on the ground and that the presence of safe onward travel hubs is increasing. However, the report also points out that progress is uneven and that national leadership on women’s safety at stations has been discussed for decades without fully resolving persistent gaps. The investigation concludes that improvements often depend on the priorities of individual train operators or local authorities, producing a patchwork of standards across the rail network.

Regulators have also been examining passenger assistance and the experience of those who may be particularly vulnerable when travelling alone. The Office of Rail and Road’s first annual benchmarking report on passenger assistance, released in 2024, indicated that a significant minority of passengers did not receive the support they had booked when changing trains or boarding at unfamiliar stations. Advocacy groups argue that when assistance fails, disabled women and older passengers can be left stranded on platforms or forced to navigate poorly lit areas without help, compounding existing safety concerns.

Calls for a more consistent approach to women’s safety

The latest findings have intensified calls from campaigners and passenger groups for a more consistent, system-wide approach to women’s safety on the railways. Recommendations emerging from the Soroptimist survey and other recent research emphasise relatively straightforward steps such as ensuring stations and car parks are well lit, keeping more facilities staffed into the evening, and giving passengers clear information about where to go for help.

Advocates say there is also a growing recognition that safety is about feelings as much as incident statistics. Publicly available reports from women’s organisations and transport researchers argue that even in locations where recorded crime is low, design and staffing decisions can either heighten or reduce anxiety. They suggest that involving women and girls directly in decisions about station upgrades, staffing patterns and new technology could help rebuild trust in a network that many currently navigate with caution.

For the rail industry, the challenge is likely to be balancing cost pressures with rising expectations that stations should be not only operationally efficient but also clearly welcoming and safe for all users. As more investigations shed light on specific shortcomings, pressure is increasing on operators and policymakers to show that measures to protect women at train stations are not treated as optional extras but as central to the way the UK rail system is planned and run.