EU fines Czech Railways for anti-competitive bidding

Follow us on Google

The European Commission has imposed a multimillion-euro fine on Czech state-owned operator České dráhy for anti-competitive bidding practices involving used rolling stock, in a case that highlights Brussels’ tougher stance on collusion in Europe’s liberalizing rail market.

Commission targets collusion in rolling stock sales

According to publicly available information, the European Commission concluded that České dráhy, commonly known as ČD, engaged in unlawful coordination with Austria’s ÖBB over the sale of used long-distance coaches. The behavior was examined under European Union rules on cartels and restrictive business practices.

Published coverage indicates that the Commission found the two incumbent operators had coordinated their bids and negotiations around second-hand rolling stock at a time when private challenger RegioJet was seeking trains to expand its long-distance services in Central Europe. Investigators determined that this cooperation went beyond normal commercial dealings and amounted to a concerted effort to restrict access to essential assets.

The decision forms part of case AT.40401, which examined whether the incumbents used their market power and control over fleets of interoperable coaches to make it harder for a new entrant to secure suitable vehicles. Brussels competition officials framed the conduct as a form of collective boycott that distorted competition on liberalized cross-border and domestic routes.

Reports indicate that the fine against ČD and its Austrian counterpart totals 48.7 million euros, with ČD bearing the larger share. Both companies retain the right to challenge the decision in the EU courts, and appeals are understood to be pending.

Impact on RegioJet and market liberalization

RegioJet, a private operator based in the Czech Republic, has played a prominent role in opening up long-distance passenger competition in the region. The company uses refurbished coaches and locomotives to run services on corridors such as Prague to Ostrava and international links toward Austria and Slovakia.

Access to suitable second-hand rolling stock is widely viewed as critical for new operators because it allows them to launch or expand services without the cost and lead times associated with new trains. Publicly available analyses of the case suggest that obstructing a competitor’s access to these assets can be as damaging as undercutting on price or blocking track capacity.

Observers note that the Commission’s action comes after years of tension between incumbent state-owned operators and newer private rail companies in Central Europe. In earlier disputes, RegioJet and other challengers had accused dominant carriers of using pricing and capacity strategies that made effective competition difficult, even after formal legal barriers to market entry were removed.

The finding against ČD and ÖBB therefore resonates beyond a single set of transactions. It signals that European regulators are prepared to intervene where control over rolling stock, depots or other key facilities is used in ways that may disadvantage newcomers, even when those practices do not directly involve infrastructure access or timetable allocation.

České dráhy under pressure over competition record

ČD, headquartered in Prague, is the main passenger rail operator in the Czech Republic and remains one of the country’s largest state-owned enterprises. Over the past decade it has faced several competition-related investigations and penalties at national level, including cases involving public procurement procedures and suspected abuse of dominance in regional and long-distance passenger services.

National coverage in the Czech Republic has pointed to previous fines for issues such as alleged unlawful splitting of repair contracts and contested tendering for new or modernized trains. In a separate high-profile case, the Czech competition authority levied a substantial penalty on ČD for conduct described as abusive pricing on routes where private operators sought access.

The new European penalty adds a cross-border dimension to this compliance record. Analysts suggest that for a state-owned operator pursuing modernization and international partnerships, repeated findings of anti-competitive behavior can complicate relations with regulators, regional transport authorities and potential commercial partners.

At the same time, ČD remains a central part of Czech transport policy, running long-distance express trains, regional connections and commuter services under contract with the state and regional governments. Balancing that public-service role with the requirements of EU competition law has become an increasingly complex task as markets open to rival operators.

What the case means for Europe’s rail competition

The Commission’s decision is being closely watched by policymakers and industry observers across Europe, where passenger rail liberalization has advanced at different speeds. The case highlights that effective competition depends not only on formal track access and timetable rights, but also on whether new operators can obtain trains, maintenance services and station facilities on fair terms.

Competition specialists note that second-hand rolling stock is particularly important on international and high-speed corridors that require vehicles certified for multiple countries. If incumbent operators coordinate to keep such fleets out of rivals’ hands, regulators may regard that as a serious obstacle to entry even when no single company holds a legal monopoly.

The ruling may therefore encourage other aspiring operators to bring complaints where they believe access to rolling stock or depots has been restricted through coordinated behavior. It could also prompt incumbent railways to review their sales, leasing and procurement policies to ensure that commercial decisions do not create the appearance of collective boycotts.

For travelers, the immediate effect of the fine will be limited, as no services are scheduled to be withdrawn because of the decision. Over time, however, stricter enforcement against anti-competitive agreements in the rail sector could support a more diverse mix of operators, potentially leading to more choice, differentiated service levels and competitive pricing on major routes.

Next steps and potential appeals

Both ČD and ÖBB have the option to challenge the Commission’s findings before the General Court of the European Union. Such appeals typically focus on the legal interpretation of competition rules, the assessment of evidence and the proportionality of fines.

Legal commentators point out that EU courts have in some past cases reduced penalties or annulled decisions where they found procedural shortcomings or disagreed with aspects of the Commission’s analysis. However, the courts also tend to uphold robust enforcement where evidence of coordinated market restriction is strong.

Regardless of the outcome of any appeal, the case is expected to shape compliance strategies in the European rail industry. Large state-backed incumbents are likely to invest more heavily in internal competition-law training, documentation of sales decisions and independent review of transactions involving potential or actual rivals.

For competition authorities and regulators, the decision reinforces a message that the liberalization of passenger rail is not only about privatization or open-access permissions, but also about ensuring that market behavior supports, rather than undermines, the emergence of genuine competition on Europe’s busiest tracks.