Ryanair chief urges sacking of UK air traffic control boss

Ryanair chief executive Michael O’Leary is urging the UK government to dismiss the head of the country’s air traffic control provider after days of disruption that have left thousands of passengers facing cancellations, long delays and overnight airport stays.

Call for NATS leadership change after latest system failure

According to recent coverage, O’Leary has written to UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander calling for Martin Rolfe, chief executive of National Air Traffic Services (NATS), to be removed from his post. The intervention follows a severe technical failure in the UK’s air traffic control system on 8 September 2026 that triggered widespread disruption across the network for several days.

Publicly available information from Ryanair’s own statements indicates that the airline has described Rolfe as “overpaid” and “failing,” arguing that repeated outages show a lack of effective investment in both core and backup systems. A stock exchange announcement reported that this is at least the fourth major NATS systems incident in 2026, prompting the carrier to again press for a change of leadership at the UK air navigation service provider.

Coverage on UK and Irish news outlets shows that O’Leary has also used recorded video messages and social media to amplify his demands, urging passengers affected by delays to contact elected representatives and press for reforms at NATS. The airline maintains that while air traffic control is outside its direct control, the resulting disruption seriously affects its operations and undermines passenger confidence in the reliability of UK airspace.

Days of disruption across UK airports

Reports from British media and live aviation trackers indicate that the 8 September failure in NATS flight data processing led to capacity restrictions and temporary suspensions at several UK airports, including the country’s busiest hubs. Over subsequent days, more than a thousand flights were cancelled, with many more delayed as controllers worked under manual or degraded procedures and airline schedules backed up.

Ryanair has said in market filings and corporate updates that tens of thousands of its passengers alone have been affected by cancellations and long delays linked to this and other recent NATS incidents. One recent company statement tied a separate July 2026 systems problem to delays of up to three hours on roughly 155 Ryanair flights, underscoring how even short-lived issues at the air navigation provider can cascade rapidly across tightly timed low-cost networks.

Images and eyewitness accounts shared with broadcasters and on social media show passengers sleeping on terminal floors, queuing for rebooking desks and reporting difficulties obtaining clear information about revised departure times. Travel industry commentators note that when air traffic control capacity drops suddenly, airlines often struggle to reposition aircraft and crew, which can push knock-on disruption well beyond the initial technical recovery period.

Long-running tensions between Ryanair and NATS

The latest row adds to a series of public clashes between Ryanair and NATS leadership. Corporate press releases from the airline dating back several years show repeated calls for Rolfe to “resign” or “be sacked” after specific episodes of disruption, including staff shortages at London Gatwick, a closure at East Midlands Airport due to controller availability and earlier technical outages affecting UK airspace.

In one such statement, Ryanair argued that staff shortages at NATS had caused sharp rises in UK air traffic delays and forced airports to limit movements during peak summer periods. Another release urged the NATS board and the UK government, which holds a 49 percent stake in the provider through a state shareholding, to address what the airline characterises as chronic under-resourcing and weak management of the national system.

Ryanair has also campaigned at European level for broader air traffic control reform, publishing online campaigns encouraging passengers to complain directly to transport ministries about ATC strikes and infrastructure failures. Travel analysts point out that such public pressure is consistent with the airline’s broader communications strategy, which frequently links operational disruption to external factors such as air traffic control or airport staffing.

Passenger impact and questions over compensation

The prolonged disruption following the September failure has raised fresh questions for travellers about their rights and recourse when air traffic control issues derail journeys. Under UK and EU rules on air passenger rights, cancellations and long delays caused solely by air traffic control failures are often treated as extraordinary circumstances, limiting airlines’ obligation to pay fixed-sum compensation even when schedules collapse.

Consumer advocates quoted in recent coverage note that carriers must still offer re-routing, refunds and care such as meals and hotel accommodation, but may not owe the additional lump-sum compensation that applies when the cause lies within the airline’s control. This distinction has long been a point of contention for passengers, particularly when they face extended disruption that appears, from their perspective, similar to airline-caused delays.

Ryanair has previously promoted online tools that direct customers to lodge complaints with governments and regulators about air traffic control disruptions. Industry observers suggest that the latest NATS outage and O’Leary’s call for Rolfe’s dismissal are likely to intensify public debate over whether current rules strike the right balance between protecting passengers and recognising the limits of airline responsibility for third-party infrastructure.

Pressure grows for review of UK air traffic resilience

Published commentary in the UK aviation and business press indicates growing pressure for a formal review into NATS’s resilience and governance after this year’s sequence of failures. Critics argue that a series of high-profile incidents, including the September 2026 data processing failure and earlier technical and staffing problems, points to systemic weaknesses in both technology and planning for peak periods.

Supporters of NATS cited in previous reporting have emphasised the overall safety record of UK air traffic services and the complexity of operating a heavily used section of European airspace. They contend that, while disruption is highly visible and costly when it occurs, the organisation successfully manages hundreds of thousands of movements each year without major incident.

For now, publicly available statements from NATS focus on restoring normal operations, cooperating with regulatory oversight and investing in upgrades designed to modernise systems. However, Ryanair’s demand for leadership change, amplified by passenger frustration and political scrutiny, means that the September disruption is likely to remain a flashpoint in ongoing discussions over how UK airspace is managed in the years ahead.

Independent: Ryanair boss demands air traffic chief be sacked after UK airport crisis

Ryanair market announcement calling for NATS CEO to be sacked

Inkl: Ryanair chief calls for air traffic control boss to be dismissed

Midlands 103: Ryanair boss calls for UK air traffic chief to be sacked