More news on this day
From Buenos Aires to Bogotá, South American governments are loosening long standing limits on airline capacity and routes, promising more flexibility and competition in the skies. Yet for many travelers still stitching together multi stop itineraries, the question is whether this new wave of liberalization will truly translate into more direct flights and smoother journeys.
Get the latest news straight to your inbox!

Open Skies Deals Redraw the Regulatory Map
South America is in the midst of a structural shift in how governments regulate air services. A growing number of countries are moving away from tightly managed bilateral caps on flights and toward open skies style frameworks that give airlines more freedom to decide where and how often they fly. Regional policy documents and government plans indicate a broader push to liberalize air transport, including multilateral initiatives under the International Civil Aviation Organization and fresh bilateral deals with key markets.
Argentina has emerged as a prominent example of this trend. Official policy papers describe a new phase for the country’s aviation system centered on deregulation and an open skies approach, backed by agreements with multiple partners to ease previous restrictions on capacity and frequencies. Separate communications from Argentina’s transport authorities have also highlighted steps to expand operations at Buenos Aires’ city airport, Aeroparque Jorge Newbery, lifting long standing limits on regional and larger aircraft and allowing more domestic and near international flights to use the centrally located hub.
The United States, already a long standing advocate of open skies globally, lists several South American partners among its liberalized aviation agreements. These texts generally remove government interference in pricing and capacity decisions, in theory enabling airlines to add nonstops whenever demand and aircraft availability justify the move. Similar principles are appearing in frameworks between South American states themselves, suggesting that intra regional flying could become progressively easier for carriers to schedule.
Taken together, these policy changes create a more permissive backdrop for airlines. However, the existence of an open skies agreement or a liberalized airport regime does not automatically mean a flood of new point to point services. Commercial considerations, fleet plans and competitive dynamics all play decisive roles in determining whether travelers will actually see more direct routes on sale.
Airlines Expand Networks, But Not Always Point to Point
Major South American carriers are reshaping their networks in response to the more flexible policy landscape, but much of the activity still centers on feeding established hubs rather than launching large numbers of entirely new nonstop city pairs. LATAM Airlines has outlined plans to deepen connectivity across the region using new generation Embraer E195 E2 jets, which allow it to serve medium sized markets more efficiently from its key bases. Company announcements emphasize better connectivity between smaller cities and main hubs, expanding options for travelers who previously needed multiple stops inside the region before reaching long haul flights.
Brazilian operator Gol, which recently completed a court supervised restructuring, is likewise signaling growth plans built around both domestic strength and selected international expansion. Investor presentations and restructuring materials describe a five year plan to increase fleet size and extend the route network, including additional international bases and more links from Brazilian cities to neighboring countries. In practice, this has translated into new and resumed regional routes, as well as high profile long haul announcements such as a planned wide body service from Rio de Janeiro to New York, intended to elevate Rio’s role as an international gateway.
Colombian based Avianca has also been rebuilding and refining its long haul and regional schedules. Corporate updates in 2024 detailed the return of multiple direct international routes for peak seasons, strengthening links between North America, Central America and South America. These moves improve the chances of finding a one stop itinerary between secondary cities, but they also reinforce the centrality of hub airports, where carriers can concentrate demand and make flights economically viable.
For travelers, the picture that emerges is mixed. More routes are being added, and some are genuinely new nonstops that did not exist a few years ago. Yet many of the announced changes involve seasonal services, added frequencies on existing city pairs, or new spokes feeding the same handful of hubs. The structural liberalization of air rights enables these strategies, but it does not guarantee that smaller origin and destination pairs will see their own dedicated direct flights.
Why Liberalization Does Not Automatically Mean More Nonstops
The gap between policy flexibility and practical nonstop options stems largely from airline economics. Even in a fully liberalized environment, carriers need consistent demand, available aircraft and the right cost structure to sustain point to point routes. Long haul flights connecting South America with North America or Europe usually require wide body aircraft, which are in limited supply and often prioritized for the busiest, highest yielding markets. Regional routes, although possible with smaller jets, still require sufficient passenger volumes to justify daily or near daily service.
Industry analyses of Latin American aviation note that many airlines in the region are emerging from financially challenging years marked by high debt burdens, currency volatility and delayed aircraft deliveries. In this context, route planners tend to favor incremental growth around proven hubs instead of riskier experiments with thin nonstop routes between secondary cities. Liberalized agreements may remove regulatory barriers, but they do not change underlying demand patterns or the need to recover costs on each flight.
Another limiting factor is airport infrastructure and slots. While airports such as Aeroparque in Buenos Aires are seeing capacity rules relaxed, others remain tightly constrained by runway limits or terminal congestion. Liberal traffic rights cannot easily overcome physical bottlenecks. Airlines that gain additional freedom on paper may still find it difficult to secure the schedules they need at peak times, especially for business heavy routes where timing is critical to capture demand.
As a result, the immediate outcome of policy shifts in South America is more often greater choice within existing hub and spoke systems rather than a rapid proliferation of nonstop links between every pair of major cities. Over time, if liberalization contributes to sustained traffic growth and stronger airline finances, that could change, but the transition is likely to be gradual.
What Travellers Are Likely to Notice in the Near Term
In the coming seasons, travelers to and within South America are more likely to notice incremental improvements rather than a wholesale transformation of the route map. More flights at convenient times, seasonal nonstops on popular holiday routes and better one stop connections via regional hubs are all becoming more common. Liberalized policies make it easier for airlines to adjust capacity quickly, add frequencies when demand spikes and experiment with new routes without lengthy bilateral negotiations.
International visitors from North America and Europe may see stronger connectivity into secondary South American cities through partnerships and codeshare arrangements, even if their tickets still route them through major hubs such as São Paulo, Lima, Bogotá or Santiago. Some carriers are using new partnerships to offer virtual nonstops in the form of tightly timed connections, where liberal traffic rights between partner airlines and countries simplify scheduling and ticketing.
For residents of South American countries, domestic and short haul regional travel could become more flexible as open skies principles filter into national markets. Government plans in Argentina, for example, point to more provincial connections and a broader range of services using city airports that were previously constrained. LATAM’s deployment of new regional aircraft and Gol’s network expansion in Brazil are both likely to produce additional options on intra regional legs, which can shorten overall journey times even when a full nonstop from origin to final destination remains unavailable.
However, passengers hoping for an immediate surge of new city pair nonstops may need to temper expectations. The most commercially attractive routes are still likely to receive the bulk of new capacity, while thinner markets rely on improved connections and seasonal services. Liberalized skies open the door to change, but airlines will continue to move cautiously, weighing each potential nonstop against the proven efficiency of funneling traffic through established hubs.
Longer Term Prospects for True Point to Point Growth
Looking further ahead, analysts see several reasons why the current liberalization wave could eventually deliver more genuine point to point connectivity in South America. First, as carriers complete fleet renewal and expansion plans, they will have more aircraft and a wider range of sizes to deploy. Orders for efficient narrowbodies and new generation regional jets give network planners tools to profitably serve markets that were previously too small for larger aircraft, especially on routes of a few hours’ duration within the continent.
Second, if open skies arrangements succeed in stimulating tourism and business travel, demand on certain city pairs could grow to the point where nonstop service becomes viable. Historical examples from other regions suggest that liberalization can produce compounding effects, with new routes spurring economic links that in turn support additional flights. South American governments appear to be banking on this dynamic as they promote aviation as a driver of investment, trade and inbound visitors.
Third, the competitive landscape is shifting as low cost and hybrid carriers explore more cross border opportunities. With fewer regulatory barriers, these airlines can test new transnational routes and respond more quickly to emerging demand. If some of those experiments succeed, they could push legacy carriers to match or counter with their own nonstops, gradually thickening the web of direct connections.
For now, the region’s skies are clearly more open on paper than they were a decade ago, but the lived experience for travelers remains in transition. The promise of more flexible flights is real, yet the path from regulatory reform to a rich map of nonstop routes is shaped by economics, infrastructure and risk appetite as much as by international agreements.