More news on this day
Airlines are intensifying pressure on the chief executive of the UK’s air traffic control provider after a major systems failure triggered days of disruption across key airports, reigniting questions over the resilience and governance of one of Europe’s busiest airspace networks.
Get the latest news straight to your inbox!

Fresh outage deepens pressure on NATS leadership
UK airports are facing a second day of disruption following a technical failure at the country’s national air traffic control provider, NATS, that has led to the cancellation or delay of more than a thousand flights and left passengers stranded across terminals and on aircraft. Published coverage indicates that Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester and Stansted are among the worst affected hubs, with knock-on effects rippling across European networks.
Reports from flight tracking services and airport statements show that the outage, which began on 8 September 2026, forced controllers to reduce flight volumes while the system was restored, sharply constraining capacity in already busy late-summer schedules. Airlines have warned that the resulting backlog could take days to clear as aircraft and crew are repositioned and stranded passengers are rebooked.
NATS chief executive Martin Rolfe has publicly apologised for the disruption and said that safety systems worked as intended when the fault emerged. According to government briefings cited in UK media, a cyberattack has been ruled out, but the company has been given a week to deliver an initial explanation of what went wrong and how a recurrence will be prevented.
The latest disruption follows a high-profile technical failure in August 2023 that also grounded flights and left tens of thousands of passengers facing cancellations, and comes after previous criticism over staffing shortages affecting services at Gatwick. Industry commentators say the pattern of incidents has intensified scrutiny of NATS’ technology and leadership.
Low-cost carriers lead calls for CEO to go
Leading low-cost carriers are now publicly urging a change at the top of NATS. Ryanair, the UK’s largest airline by passenger numbers, has called for Martin Rolfe to be removed, publishing a statement arguing that repeated system failures and disruption demonstrate a “pattern of failure” at the air navigation provider.
Coverage of airline reactions indicates that senior figures at other budget carriers, including Wizz Air’s UK arm, have also questioned whether the current chief executive should remain in post after a second major technology breakdown in three years. Aviation trade outlets report that a group of low-cost airlines has accused NATS of failing to adequately modernise and stress-test its systems despite previous outages.
Ryanair and other carriers have framed the latest incident as avoidable and have pointed to what they describe as the high costs they already pay for UK air traffic services. Airlines argue that they and their customers ultimately shoulder the financial impact of cancellations, delays, passenger care obligations and operational disruption whenever the national control system fails.
While calls for Rolfe’s departure have been loudest among low-cost operators, full-service airlines have also expressed frustration, with several flag carriers warning that repeated outages risk undermining confidence in UK airspace and damaging the country’s reputation as a reliable aviation hub.
Government weighs accountability as disruption mounts
The UK government, which holds a significant minority and “golden share” in NATS, is under growing pressure to respond. According to business and political reporting, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has summoned the NATS chief executive for urgent discussions and has asked the Civil Aviation Authority to oversee an independent review of the failure.
Downing Street has signalled that it expects NATS to provide a detailed account within seven days, including the root cause of the outage, why contingency measures did not prevent extensive cancellations, and what investment or reforms may be required. At the same time, government sources cited in media reports have indicated that NATS’ board currently retains confidence in its leadership while investigations continue.
The complex ownership structure of NATS, which includes the government, a consortium of airlines, an airport operator and employee shareholders, is likely to feature in the political debate. Analysts note that airlines calling for Rolfe’s removal are themselves part of the shareholder group, raising questions about how governance arrangements balance commercial interests with wider public responsibilities.
Parliamentary scrutiny is expected to focus not only on the immediate failure but also on whether lessons were fully implemented after the 2023 system breakdown and subsequent reviews, as well as on the adequacy of long-term investment in critical aviation infrastructure.
Passengers face cancellations, delays and limited recourse
For travellers, the immediate impact has been visible in crowded terminals, long queues at airline service desks and images of passengers sleeping on airport floors. News outlets and social media posts describe passengers being kept on aircraft for hours before flights were cancelled, while others faced overnight stays after missing onward connections.
Public information from airlines and rail operators shows that carriers are offering rebooking and, in some cases, accommodation, while UK rail companies have agreed to allow affected air passengers to travel on some services without additional charges. However, passenger rights experts note that compensation entitlements may be limited if the disruption is ultimately classified as outside airlines’ control, leaving many travellers dependent on goodwill policies rather than statutory payouts.
Consumer groups are advising passengers to retain receipts for food, accommodation and alternative transport, to monitor airline apps and websites for rebooking options, and to be prepared for continuing disruption as schedules gradually stabilise. With aircraft and crews out of position, even airports not directly hit by the outage are likely to see knock-on delays.
Industry observers warn that the incident may reinforce a perception among travellers that UK aviation remains vulnerable to large-scale disruption, following previous summers marked by staffing shortages, security queues and earlier air traffic control problems.
Longer-term questions over UK airspace resilience
Beyond immediate accountability, the latest outage has renewed debate about the robustness of the UK’s air traffic management system. Aviation analysts quoted across specialist and mainstream outlets highlight the complexity of NATS’ Swanwick operations centre, which manages en route airspace over England and Wales and handles millions of flights each year.
Experts suggest that increasing traffic volumes, legacy software, and the challenges of integrating new digital tools may all be contributing to system vulnerability. Comparisons are being drawn with other European air navigation providers, some of which have embarked on extensive modernisation programmes to replace ageing infrastructure and improve redundancy.
The Civil Aviation Authority’s forthcoming review is expected to examine whether backup systems and manual procedures at NATS are sufficient to keep flight movements running at higher levels during a main-system failure. Airlines are likely to push for clearer performance benchmarks, tighter oversight and potentially changes to how NATS is funded and incentivised to invest in resilience.
For now, industry figures and passenger advocates alike are watching to see whether current leadership can restore confidence or whether mounting airline pressure will force a change at the top of one of the UK’s most strategically important transport providers.
ABC News: UK airport chaos continues, NATS given one week to investigate outage
The Guardian: NATS boss summoned as UK flight cancellations mount
Aviation Business News: Low-cost carriers call for NATS CEO to resign
Sky News: NATS crisis and calls for the air traffic control boss to quit