More news on this day
Travelers heading to Europe this autumn face renewed warnings over airport queues as temporary flexibility in the EU’s new Entry/Exit System (EES) expires, removing a safety valve that allowed border authorities to ease biometric checks during severe congestion.
Get the latest news straight to your inbox!
New phase for EU’s digital border checks
The EU’s Entry/Exit System, a large-scale biometric database for non-EU nationals entering and leaving the Schengen area, has been fully operational at all external border crossing points since 10 April 2026, following a progressive rollout that began in October 2025. Publicly available information from EU institutions describes the system as a cornerstone of efforts to modernize border controls, replace passport stamping, and improve tracking of overstays.
During the initial 180 day deployment, member states were allowed to introduce the system gradually and, in defined circumstances, suspend or limit its use to prevent untenable queues at busy airports and land crossings. EU legislation adopted in July 2025 set out temporary derogations that made it possible for border authorities to pause EES checks when technical failures or exceptional traffic volumes led to excessive waiting times.
That transition window has now closed. Recent public guidance and traveler reports indicate that the special flexibility measures expired in early September 2026, meaning border posts are expected to apply the full EES procedure for third country nationals in normal circumstances, rather than reverting to manual passport stamps to clear backlogs.
The shift marks a significant change for passengers. While many travelers were already being enrolled in EES during the phased rollout, the end of flexibility narrows the scope for ad hoc workarounds at peak times, heightening concerns that airports with limited staffing or infrastructure could again see long lines at non EU passport control.
Why flexibility mattered for airport operations
Under the temporary derogations, border authorities could partially or fully suspend EES operations at certain crossing points when technical disruptions or exceptional traffic risked creating extreme delays. Legal summaries on EUR Lex describe these powers as a way to “enable the effective adjustment of technical and organisational arrangements” during the system’s progressive start and in the immediate period after it entered into force.
In practice, this meant that when lines built up, some airports returned to traditional stamp based checks for selected flights or time periods. Trade bodies representing airports and airlines previously argued that such flexibility was critical when the system first went live at full scale in April 2026, after earlier tests had already revealed bottlenecks at border booths handling first time biometric registration.
Industry statements from April 2026 highlighted cases of passengers facing waits of two to three hours at some Schengen airports on the first day of full EES operations, and urged EU institutions and member states to maintain options to reduce checks temporarily to keep queues manageable. That appeal underlined how heavily the initial rollout relied on the legal leeway provided by the temporary measures.
With those measures now elapsed, airports lose a tool they had used to smooth the transition. While structural improvements such as additional e gates and more staff can offset the impact, they take time and investment, and not all airports especially smaller regional gateways favored by leisure travelers have seen capacity expanded at the same pace as traffic.
Mixed experiences during the rollout
Since EES entered into operation in October 2025, traveler accounts and airport updates have painted a mixed picture across Europe. Larger hubs that invested early in extra kiosks and signage often reported an initial spike in waiting times followed by gradual improvement as staff and passengers became more familiar with the process and as more travelers completed their first time biometric registration.
However, anecdotal reports from a range of airports through spring and summer 2026 pointed to persistent unevenness. Some passengers described relatively smooth processing at major hubs on off peak days, while others reported extended queues at regional airports where only a handful of booths were open when multiple non EU flights arrived close together.
Online travel communities and airline forums throughout 2026 frequently discussed how long to allow for connections at Schengen hubs once EES became mandatory. Contributors highlighted that first time registration, which involves capturing fingerprints and a facial image alongside passport data, typically took significantly longer than a repeat crossing for travelers already recorded in the system.
As the peak summer season progressed, discussions turned to how often airports were temporarily “switching off” EES or reverting to manual stamping to prevent missed connections, making use of the flexibility provided under the transitional rules. These experiences underpin current concerns that, with this option now largely removed, similar traffic levels could translate more directly into queues at control points.
What travelers can expect at border control
EES applies to most non EU, non Schengen nationals entering the external borders of the Schengen area for short stays, including visitors from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and many other countries that do not require a visa for trips of up to 90 days in any 180 day period. According to official explanations, each time such travelers cross the border the system records their entry or exit and, where applicable, a refusal of entry.
For first time entrants since the system went live, the process involves scanning a passport, capturing fingerprints and a photograph, and verifying data against security databases before entry is granted. On subsequent trips, border officers are expected to confirm the traveler’s identity and status primarily through the existing biometric record, which should shorten processing compared with the initial enrollment.
With the end of temporary flexibility, travelers can expect that border posts will be less likely to switch back to manual stamps even when queues grow. Publicly available advice from EU bodies and national authorities consistently recommends allowing extra time at departure and arrival airports to accommodate the new checks, especially for those who have not yet been enrolled in EES.
For connecting flights, this means passengers should build in more buffer time at their first Schengen point of entry, where EES checks take place. While some airports have adjusted schedules and staffing to account for the additional workload, there remains a risk that delays at border control could cascade into missed connections when itineraries leave little margin.
Key hubs and holiday airports under scrutiny
The focus of many traveler concerns now turns to the airports that struggled most visibly during earlier phases of the rollout. Commentary from airport and airline associations in April 2026 singled out busy hubs handling large volumes of non EU traffic, where even modest slowdowns at border control quickly translated into congestion in arrival halls and queues stretching back toward gate areas.
At the same time, anecdotal accounts from summer 2026 highlighted issues at smaller regional airports that serve popular holiday destinations but have more limited border control infrastructure. When two or three leisure flights on narrowbody aircraft arrive in close succession and only a few EES enabled booths are staffed, waiting times can lengthen rapidly, particularly for first time EES users.
With flexibility measures no longer available, these airports may find it harder to rely on manual stamping as a relief valve during sudden surges in arrivals. Travelers heading for beach resorts or regional city breaks through such gateways may face the greatest uncertainty in the short term, especially during school holidays and long weekends.
Airport operators have indicated through previous public statements that they are working with national authorities to refine passenger flows, improve wayfinding for EES kiosks and reinforce staffing at border control where possible. Nonetheless, as autumn and winter travel seasons begin, the interaction between full scale EES checks and existing capacity constraints will be closely watched by the industry and by travelers planning trips into the Schengen area.
European Commission: EES fully operational and exemptions
EUR Lex summary: EU Entry/Exit System and temporary derogations