More news on this day
British travellers are being urged to reconsider high-risk holidays as the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) maintains its strongest level of travel warning for 36 countries and territories worldwide, highlighting conflict, terrorism, civil unrest and systemic crime as key drivers.
Get the latest news straight to your inbox!
How FCDO ‘do not travel’ warnings work
The UK’s FCDO issues destination-by-destination guidance on its foreign travel advice portal, ranging from routine safety notes to the most severe level of caution, where it advises against all travel to a country or large parts of it. Publicly available information shows that, as of late August 2026, 36 countries and territories attract this top tier of concern in some form, either for the whole state or for significant regions.
These advisories are not legal bans, but they carry serious practical consequences. Published guidance explains that travelling against FCDO advice can invalidate many standard UK travel insurance policies, leaving holidaymakers exposed to medical costs, cancellations or emergency evacuations they must fund themselves. Insurers often reference the FCDO’s wording directly in their policy exclusions.
Unlike blanket global restrictions used during the Covid-19 pandemic, current country pages tend to be highly granular. Official maps and regional risk sections divide destinations into zones where all travel is discouraged, where only essential trips are advised, and where tourism is considered broadly acceptable if normal precautions are taken. This means a single country can simultaneously host popular beach resorts and no-go conflict areas.
The situation remains fluid. The FCDO updates its pages frequently in response to new security incidents, political crises or natural disasters. Travellers planning autumn and winter trips are therefore being encouraged, in media and industry coverage, to check the exact wording for their destination as close as possible to departure.
Conflict hotspots leading the ‘do not travel’ list
Armed conflict is the clearest driver of the UK’s strictest advice. Afghanistan remains one of the most prominent examples, with FCDO briefing maps showing the entire country shaded in red for “advise against all travel” because of terrorism, instability and the absence of a functioning consular presence. Similar language appears in advice for parts of Syria and Yemen, where prolonged civil wars and foreign interventions continue to impact basic security.
The ongoing war in Ukraine has also reshaped European travel risk maps. Earlier FCDO briefing material for Ukraine highlights extensive areas in the east and south, including frontline regions and Crimea, marked as zones where all travel is discouraged due to missile strikes, heavy fighting and widespread unexploded ordnance. While western cities such as Lviv have seen some tourism return, large swathes of the country remain off-limits in current guidance.
Elsewhere, internal conflicts and fragile state control are key factors. In the Central African Republic, travel advice documents show most of the territory categorised as either “advise against all travel” or “advise against all but essential travel,” reflecting the reach of armed groups and the limited ability of authorities to ensure security outside the capital. Parts of Ethiopia and neighbouring Sudan are highlighted for similar reasons, as clashes, border disputes and humanitarian emergencies make movement unpredictable and sometimes life-threatening.
These warnings do not only target active battlefields. Published coverage notes that areas near contested borders, militarised zones and demilitarised buffer strips often carry the highest risk ratings, even if nearby cities remain relatively calm. Travellers venturing into remote regions for trekking, overlanding or adventure tourism can therefore face stricter warnings than those arriving on organised city breaks.
Terrorism, regional tensions and kidnapping risks
In several countries, terrorism and kidnapping rather than full-scale war sit behind “do not travel” style alerts. Advice for Iraq and Iran, recently updated to reflect heightened regional tensions, highlights the risk of missile and drone attacks on military and civilian infrastructure, along with the possibility of arbitrary detention of foreign nationals. While some areas have seen partial relaxation of earlier blanket warnings, specific provinces and border regions still attract “against all travel” wording.
Across the Sahel and parts of West Africa, including regions of Nigeria, the FCDO guidance underlines a combination of extremist violence, banditry and piracy. Recent updates to the Nigeria page cite riverine areas of the Niger Delta as locations where kidnapping, militancy and oil-related crime have prompted the UK to discourage all travel. Similar patterns appear in advice for coastal states on the Gulf of Guinea, where offshore attacks on shipping and support vessels remain a concern.
Israel and the Palestinian territories illustrate how fast-moving regional crises can alter advice. The dedicated regional risks section for Palestine, for example, includes areas near the Syrian border and the occupied Golan Heights where all travel is strongly discouraged because of proximity to front lines and cross-border fire. Analysts monitoring these pages note that sporadic escalations can lead to rapid extensions of no-go zones, particularly near conflict spillover points.
In parts of Latin America and the Caribbean, different security challenges dominate. High levels of organised crime, armed gangs and sporadic political unrest drive the strictest warnings in certain urban districts and rural enclaves. While entire countries in the region rarely fall under a complete “do not travel” label, the fact that some popular backpacking routes graze or cross high-risk zones is pushing tour operators and insurers to refine their risk assessments.
Where partial bans still affect popular destinations
The 36 entries on the FCDO’s highest-risk list do not all correspond to countries completely closed to tourism. In many cases, only particular regions feature an “advise against all travel” notice, while other parts of the same country continue to receive British visitors in large numbers. This split is visible in advisories for Jordan, where certain border areas are flagged for heightened risk in contrast to well-established visitor hubs such as Petra and the Dead Sea resorts.
Egypt, Turkey and several Gulf states fall into a similar category when looking at the broader pattern of FCDO advice. According to travel industry commentary which tracks these updates, resort towns and major cities may be considered acceptable, while desert frontiers, remote highways or zones near conflict-affected neighbours carry sharply different warnings. For tour operators, mapping itineraries against the red and amber areas has become a routine part of product planning.
Some territories on the list are sparsely populated or little known to casual travellers, such as Western Sahara, where the UK discourages travel in areas affected by long-running territorial disputes and landmine contamination. Others, like parts of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, attract specialist adventure and wildlife tourism but are ringed by zones marked as off-limits because of rebel activity and weak infrastructure.
The practical message for travellers is that a country’s headline risk label rarely tells the full story. Understanding which provinces, cities or crossing points are affected is essential for anyone planning overland routes, self-drive trips or multi-country tours that may inadvertently cross into higher-risk regions.
Why the exact list of 36 changes and how to check it
The number of destinations sitting under the UK’s severest advice is not fixed. The widely referenced figure of 36 countries and territories reflects a snapshot compiled from current FCDO pages and media summaries in mid-2026, but that total shifts as conflicts flare, ceasefires hold, or political transitions unfold. For example, monitoring tools that track wording changes showed Iraq’s advice being softened for some regions in June 2026, even as other areas remained firmly red.
This constant movement helps explain why the government does not publish a single static “do not travel” master list. Instead, each destination maintains a dedicated page combining safety and security notes, local laws, entry rules and health information. Changes range from minor clarifications to wholesale reclassification of regions from routine caution to “advise against all travel” overnight, sometimes following a single major incident.
Travel professionals therefore recommend that holidaymakers focus less on the headline count of risky countries and more on regularly checking the official page for their specific destination. This is especially important for travellers with connecting flights through unstable regions, overland backpackers and cruise passengers on complex multi-port itineraries. Routes that appear straightforward on a map can, in practice, brush close to areas where the FCDO actively discourages entry.
With geopolitical tensions elevated in parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East and the Sahel, and extreme weather adding further disruption, the expectation among analysts is that the composition of the UK’s 36-strong list will continue to evolve into 2027. For now, the clearest step for UK travellers is to consult the FCDO site directly and confirm that their plans, and their insurance, align with the latest published advice.
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/afghanistan